Towering Pride Gets Mankind Nowhere
Stuffing the Anunnaki into Jewish Scripture
This post is a response to
Jack Barranger, a recent MUFON speaker, touted as author of several books, a
seminary graduate in English, “a researcher on religion, spirituality, human origins, aliens
& religion, Book of Enoch, The Bible and much, much more.”
In all fairness, I
didn’t make it his lecture nor have I read his books. I am taking his point
from a very brief summary on the MUFON flyer, which was sent out by email. It
stated:
1. Anunnaki aliens [Sumerian god-like entities
who are mentioned in some of our earliest literature] gave humans religion to
enslave us.
2. The Anunnaki created us to mine gold for
them.
3. References from The Bible and The Book of
Enoch were given to highlight events and fears created by the Anunnaki to keep
humans obedient and unquestioning. These include ousting Adam & Eve from
the Garden of Eden, destroying of the Tower of Babel, the Great Flood, and the
threat of hell.
Barranger has done
what many have done before him. He took an Israelite document which was written
as history in order to make a clear theological point to their own captive people, discarded the author’s
point, cherry picked through the passages, and, accepting the story as
historically accurate, claimed that he had the true understanding of what
happened and what it meant.
It reminds me of the
time when I submitted a sentence in German to a language forum. I offered what
I thought was a logical attempt at translation, but wanted it checked. (I am at
mid-level in ability to read German.) An American who is much more advanced
than I supported my translation, but two native German speakers who knew both the
language and the culture jumped in and assured us both that the author meant
the exact opposite of what we supposed. I think the same thing has happened
with Barranger. He has so missed the author’s point in Genesis that he is
proposing the exact opposite interpretation of what the stories in Genesis
mean.
His first premise is
not so crazy. The Enuma Elish (Tablet
VI) and the legend of Atrahasis do
say that the lesser gods worked hard in service to the higher gods, so they
complained. Humans were created to take over the drudgery. Temples were huge
and owned lots of land and cattle just for the service of the gods and denizens
of the temples. These gods are very different from the OT deity in that they
ate, slept, procreated, and fought each other, whereas Yahweh did none of those
things. The Mesopotamian gods were capricious and dangerous and needed to be mollified with sacrifices.
Now whether these gods were aliens from another planet, demonic entities,
mythological constructs, or a combination thereof is a question I won’t address
here.
A friend recently
noticed a similarity between two Genesis passages and asked me to write an
expanded study of them. I think the comparison of the two stories helps to
explain the whole point of the Book of Genesis.
First, Gen. 11:1-9, the Tower of Babel
Genesis records that people
came from the east (the Persian Gulf and beyond?) and settled in Shinar, which
is Sumer, known as the cradle of civilization, situated between the Tigris and
Euphrates Rivers in what is now known as Iraq. There may have been different
dialects in those ancient times, but there was one ‘lingua franca.’ Both the
Bible and archaeology attest that at one point, Sumerian was spoken by most
civilized people.
They built a grand ‘tower’
that was supposed to reach the top of the heavens. Genesis says that the bricks
were fortified with bitumen and hardened by baking, which is also attested in
Mesopotamian ziggurats. The baking and bitumen (asphalt) kept the bricks from
turning to dust in a few hundred years. The purpose was “make a name for
ourselves; otherwise, we will be scattered over the face of the whole earth.”
Sacrifices were undoubted offered at the top. The idea was also to reach the
domain of the gods and acquire power, protection, and favor.
The Hebrew word for tower is ‘migdol,’ which
in later times when Israel was a state, was actually a cylindrical, stone tower
used for military and civil logistics. They elicited no spiritual associations
except that prophets and intercessors saw themselves figuratively as ‘watchmen’ on the
towers of spiritual Zion. Those towers did have guards and soldiers during
times of threat, but mostly they had literal watchmen.
I have no doubt that city walls
in third millennia BCE Sumer, which was pre-Abraham, also had towers, but the
Genesis tower was not made of stones. It was made of unique bricks that are
still in evidence today in the ancient Mesopotamian ziggurats. They were
undoubtedly set in forms very much like the illustration of brick making on
Egyptian temple walls.
But why call it a “tower?”
The root word for migdol is something like gadol, meaning
greatness. So the ziggurat was the greatest thing in the region. There was
nothing to compare to them in their day except maybe the great pyramids of
Egypt. So it makes no sense that the Babylonian tower would be anything other
than a ziggurat. Gods lived on mountains, and Sumer is a flat river plain, so
the stairway to the top of the ziggurat was as close to heaven as you could get
in the region.
The phrase, "it touched heaven" was also used idiomatically of the walls of Uruk in Sumerian literature. It
just means they were really high. It’s like us saying, “I told you a hundred
times to stop.” The thing that was unique about the tower was that God, or the
gods, were supposed to be at the top. But… in the Genesis account He wasn’t.
God came down to see what was going
on and was so unwilling to acquiesce to the intent of the plan that He blew is
all away. The people were scattered anyway, and languages proliferated. But
why? Was it really to hold mankind back to enslave us or was there another
reason? Let’s look at another story.
Gen. 28:11-17, Jacob’s Ladder
In the story, Jacob is
traveling from southern Palestine to northwestern Mesopotamia to find a wife
(and to get away from his brother’s wrath). He gets as far as the little town
of Luz (later Bethel) where there is already a Canaanite temple. He is tired,
so he lies down on the ground and leans against a stone for a pillow. He has a
vivid dream of a ladder that reaches to heaven. In the dream, God is actually
at the top of the ladder and angels are ascending and descending, obviously
carrying out missions to mankind at the behest of God.
God clearly identifies
Himself. He promises that Jacob’s descendants will be uncountable. He renews
the great promise that He made to Abraham, that the descendants of Jacob would
inherit the land of Canaan. He promised to be with Jacob and watch over him
wherever he went. He promised to bring him back to his native home. In other
words, his exile will only be temporary.
Yes, the two passages are
connected. One is man’s hubris thinking that with our works and ingenuity we
can reach God and maybe even become god. It’s basically the promise of the
‘serpent’ in the Garden. You won’t die. God doesn’t want you to know that you
can be like God and live forever. He’s holding you back.
God was not at the top of
the ziggurat, but He was at the top of the ladder. The ladder might be a
staircase like with a ziggurat or it might be a ladder. God Himself opened that
portal while one man slept in the dirt. It didn’t go to a place in the sky, but
went from one dimension to another. ‘Heaven’ isn’t ‘up there;’ it’s through the
veil. It was a real supernatural pathway on which the angels came and went. The
Babylonian priests would have killed to be able to wave a wand or say a chant
and open such a portal. But God clearly rejected the first and initiated the
second.
Sometimes even in our
churches there can be a danger of leaders trying to open a pathway to God by
building grand staircases in great castles. That’s why the work of the Holy
Spirit is so critical in our ministries. When God opens the door, things get
done. In Babylon, the ‘greatness’ was the magnificent structure. All who saw it
for the first time gasped. It would have been like the Sistine Chapel of its
day. In Bethel, the greatness was not any local temple. There was a common,
dusty, sweaty man lying on the ground with stones for a pillow. The greatness
was Jacob’s declaration that Yahweh is truly God and that he and his household
would serve Him forever.
Here is the point of the
Hebrew author of Genesis: Jeremiah 29:11-13
"For I know the plans I have for you,”
declares the LORD, “Plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you
hope and a future. Then you will call on me and come and pray to
me, and I will listen to you. You will seek me and find me when
you seek me with all your heart."
He's treading a well-worn path and making claims that are barely original and as lacking in logical integrity as ever.
ReplyDelete'Annunaki' made us slaves to mine gold? Gold isn't an element that can only be found on Earth. The 'Annunaki' use psychology to *scare* us into being slaves? Well if they fly around in spacecraft from their gold-depleted world and are advanced enough to engineer life-forms...why the subtlety? What use is psychology on a Neolithic culture when a star-faring, hostile species comes a-calling?
The Annunaki created the 'Great Flood' to scare us into obedience? It's a shame then, that there's no evidence of a singular great flood in the geological record. Perhaps the sneaky Annunaki removed the evidence of physical impact? There have been numerous other floods (tsunamis too), would Barranger suggest the Annunaki were responsible for these too? Where does their influence end and actual environmental cause and effect begin?
He claims the Annunaki left Earth in 800BC. Hmmmm. It's curious that no literate population had thought to make a note of the aliens flying away after oppressing humanity for so many 1000s of years. No Chinese or Indian astronomers? No Greek passages? No Egyptian comments? Curious! One would suspect that, in fact, there were no invasive Annunaki aliens after all.
That and so much more could be said. Well put Kandinsky. Thank you for the comment.
ReplyDelete