"The Final Pope is Here"
Petrus Romanus? Really?
Sources: Thomas Horn and Cris Putnam, Petrus Romanus, Crane, MO: Defender,
2012; and Malachi Martin, Windswept
House: A Vatican Novel, New York: Doubleday (Mainstreet), 1996.
I’ve been
plowing through books by Horn and Cris Putnam since I heard their interview by
Sid Roth. Their books are long, 450 to 600 pages, laden with facts, dates,
names, events, history, connections, illustrations, source references, conservative
biblical applications, and lots of risky speculation about apocalyptic arcana
and the era of 2012 to 2016. Getting through even one of the books is a
daunting task, recommended only for those who are really interested in the
topic.
Their message begins with the prophecy of St. Malachy about
the popes from Celestine II (1143-1144) to the last pope, the current Pope Francis,
called “Petrus Romanus” or Peter the Roman in the prophecy, (Chapters 1 and 2
of Petrus). In this pontiff’s reign,
according to Malachy, persecution will plague the church, Rome will be
destroyed, and the terrible Judge will judge his people. Ah, ‘tis the stuff of
a Dan Brown novel.
There is also plenty of info in the above-mentioned books covering
the secretive Freemasons and their insidious plots to use blasphemous rituals
to defile the Vatican and bring forth a satanic persona who will be the
Antichrist.
There is so much material in each book that I will devote
this post just to Petrus Romanus. Later
posts will deal with Exo-Vaticana, Zenith
2016, and maybe Windswept House.
In this 550-page opus, the prophecy of St. Malachy is
examined in excruciating detail. Whatever the reader thinks about that ancient
document, the research is impressive. Máel
Máedóc Ua Morgaèr was born in Armagh, Ireland in 1094. He rose quickly in
Catholic ranks. After a visit to Pope Innocent II, as he proceeded to leave
Rome, he alleges to have seen a vision on Janiculum Hill in which he was given a short Latin
phrase representing every pope from the time of Pope Celestine II (1143-1144)
to the very last pope, today’s Pope Frances, during whose dominion Rome will be
destroyed.
The prophecy has a long, controversial history. More than
half of the phrases may be “prophecy from the event.” The final 40 entries (post-1595,
covering 440 years) can be surprisingly accurate. Horn and Putnam do their due diligence to examine the validity
of the document and the accuracy of the prophecies. Those who read the book can
judge for him or herself whether the prophecy is a forgery or a revelation.
Some of the phrases seem spot on, others not so much.
It's intriguing that the "final pope" in the list appeared so close to a year that
other prognosticators have drawn attention to. One researcher predicted in 1950
(through logic rather than revelation) that the final pope would arrive in 2012.
Although Francis wasn’t elected until 2013, Pope Benedict announced his intent
to resign due to health issues in 2012. (p. 32, 33)
Horn
and Putnam go to great lengths to associate Malachy’s prophecy with the year 2012. That and their examination of anagrams, numerology,
and codes in The Prophecy put the book into the realm of contemporary mystic
speculative conspiracies which will fascinate some readers and turn others away. They hang
themselves way out on a limb by suggesting that Frances will in fact be the
last pope, and that he may be the False Prophet of the biblical books of Daniel
and Revelation. This was a risk they were more than willing to take.
Here is
one of those delicious quotes that kept me reading from beginning to end:
“During an audience with the general Chapter of the Franciscans in 1909, Pius X fell into a semi-trance with his head sunk on his chest, and after a few minutes he came to and opened his eyes with a look of horror on his face. He reputedly cried out: ‘What I have seen was terrible… Will it be myself? Will it be my successor? What is certain is that the Pope will quit Rome, and in fleeing from the Vatican he will have to walk over the dead bodies of his priests. Do not tell anyone while I am alive.’” See that prophecy online here. Well, that was over a century ago so let's not lose any sleep over it.
“During an audience with the general Chapter of the Franciscans in 1909, Pius X fell into a semi-trance with his head sunk on his chest, and after a few minutes he came to and opened his eyes with a look of horror on his face. He reputedly cried out: ‘What I have seen was terrible… Will it be myself? Will it be my successor? What is certain is that the Pope will quit Rome, and in fleeing from the Vatican he will have to walk over the dead bodies of his priests. Do not tell anyone while I am alive.’” See that prophecy online here. Well, that was over a century ago so let's not lose any sleep over it.
In the book, one learns in much detail the
tremendous Masonic influence of the Founding Fathers and the designers of our
currency, the District of Columbia, the Statue of Liberty, the Great Seal of
the United States, tourist attractions such as the capitol building with its
dome and pagan artwork, and the Washington Monument. The Masons, according to
Horn and Putnam, claim to go clear back to Nimrod of the Bible. They have been
plotting to usher in a New World Order ever since.
In Genesis 10, Nimrod was nothing more than a Mesopotamian “king”
of a city-state and champion hunter (as all kings were) who spread his suzerainty or dominion over other
city-states in upper and lower Sumer. He eventually exerted authority, like an
emperor, over major cities of Assyria, eight cities in all. The “great city” was
Nineveh. The Hebrew author of Genesis 1-11 may have been located in the city of
Assur and would have had access to ancient archives written on baked clay
tablets in the Akkadian and Sumerian language. Nimrod may have been a
historical king with a different foreign name, or an archetype of a King of
Kings such as Sargon I, or a reflection of legendary heroes such as Gilgamesh,
but this alleged hunter-king began his influence in Babylon and ended in
Nineveh.
No scholar of the Ancient Near East would suggest that
Nimrod was the equivalent of the god Apollo and/or Osiris. But Horn and Putnam
make the case that the Freemasons believe it and worship this combined individual/deity
even today. What is disturbing is that Horn and Putnam seem to have bought into
that assessment of Nimrod’s identity. It's seriously great clickbait.
The Freemasons have always been an influential group if one
can believe their roster of members over the centuries. That list includes George
Washington, Benjamin Franklin, most of the founding Fathers, Franklin D.
Roosevelt, his vice president Henry Wallace, George H. W. Bush, and his son
George H. In fact, we are assured that a plaque in the House of the Temple in
Washington, DC celebrates the fact that the Bush families have donated over a
million dollars to the Masonic cause. Horn claims to have seen it. He connects
Freemasonry with the Skull and Bones Society where so many of our leaders
connect with one another.
Due to eons of secrecy, it’s difficult to know for sure what
Freemasons at the upper levels actually believe and do, but Horn and Putnam
believe that they have cracked the code of Masonic symbols, revealing a
devotion to Apollo/Osiris/Nimrod at the highest levels (p. 117). This worship
involves satanic rituals whenever a new pope or president is picked. The
ultimate goal is to call forth a demonic entity (Apollo/Osiris/Nimrod) which
will be embodied as a human in order to reign over a New World Order, a One
World Government, undoubtedly assisted by global elites, politicos, billionaires,
corporate leaders, and energy moguls.
Horn introduces us to a former and late Jesuit priest named
Malachi Martin who hobnobbed with the likes of John XXIII and John Paul VI. He
was released from priestly duties to write about issues threatening the church
of his day. He believed, wrote, and stated openly that there was a cabal of
homosexuals, anti-papists, Freemasons, and satanists at the highest levels of
the Vatican. In that claim, Martin certainly was in step with the Bayside, NY apparition of the Virgin
Mary who wailed non-stop that Satan had taken over the Vatican and that assassins continually threatened Pope Paul VI. Other high
officials were making the same claim around 2000 (p. 90).
Martin claimed that a demonic ritual was performed simultaneously in the Vatican in Rome and in the U.S. on June 29, 1963. The
purpose was to enthrone Lucifer as the prince over Rome and “to assure the
sorcerous inception and embodiment in flesh of that immaterial spirit that
would fill Petrus Romanus.” These churchmen called “the superforce” were sufficiently
influential that even John Paul VI stated in 1963 that “the smoke of Satan has
entered the sanctuary.” (p. 90-93)
The fearsome scandals began even earlier than John Paul VI. Pope
Paul I died under suspicious circumstances just 33 days after his installation.
His successor, Pope Paul II, battled mutinous and deceptive Jesuits who had
virtually loosed themselves from the moorings from the traditional Vatican dock and struck out
on their own. John Paul VI inherited that conflict and pretty much lost.
There is so much more in this book that I can’t even touch
on due to space. These are interesting and troubled times. Fortunately for me,
the next two books repeat some of the major themes of this end times scenario. That
is helpful, because I am one who needs to read such a book two or three times
to really absorb it.
I am taking no stand on how accurate these predictions are.
I wrote Tom Horn in an email and reminded him what it would do to this lifetime
compendium of research if Francis dies in 2018 and another Pope steps peacefully
into his place. Horn and Putman pushed all their chips into the pot and left
themselves no back door. In the real world, the worst prophecies of doom
usually don’t come to pass whereas the worst disasters that do occur are seldom
predicted by anyone.
Comments
Post a Comment